Ambiguity is a means of
personalizing a reader’s experience. This is due to the fact that as more
details are left unclear the more our minds must draw connections together. The
mind cannot draw from an experience it has not dealt with, and as a result a
story becomes more personally connected to an individual. Experiences we have
lived are fastened onto the storyline and its characters become reflections of ourselves.
For a short amount of time we live our life in the pages written by someone
else.
Ambiguity does in some cases stop
individuals from understanding a text. While a text normally has a purpose for
being unclear, if statements were simply stated then many more individuals
would understand them. Despite this, is the meaning not diminished if the
essence behind a book is too easily grasped? We value the mental struggle of
books. Therefore ambiguity can be a way in which we mentally struggle to then
stumble across an idea in our mind that brings us to a new horizon.
What is satisfying to one man can
be vastly minimal to another individual. That is something that I think an
author has to think about when they write a text. Is this too ambiguous? Should
it contain more ambiguity? The author must write from themselves and hope the
audience perceives it well. Therefore, it truly depends on personal preference
if satisfying outcomes must be definite. However many times endings do contain ambiguity
and that is where our mind can go crazy creating a story afterward.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy how you said that the mind cannot draw from experiences it has not dealt with because that reminded me of the idea that all people we see in our dreams are people we have seen before because our mind isn’t capable of creating a new face. While the mind is a remarkable thing, it relies completely on past experience which just reiterates Fosters suggestion that all stories or books are essentially the same as past stories.